What’s the Difference between Documentary and Feature Film

       

            Feature films and documentaries are part of the living history of filmmaking; they grow, mature and change with time.

        

           Both bring forth unique visions of our world, our cultures, our lives and loves. There’s more than one difference between documentary and feature film. They each have distinct differences in style, content and audience, even as the lines between them often blur.

1. Escape vs. Reality

          In general, the main reason feature films get made is to entertain the audience; to give people an escape. Documentaries are meant to inform; to confront people with reality: and sometimes to promote a point of view.

          Documentary makers certainly want to engage and captivate their audience, and some feature films can be very informative, but a key difference between the documentary and feature film is in the filmmaker’s motivation.

2. Fact or Fiction

          Feature films are mostly fiction, sometimes total fantasy. Some may be based on real events or people, but the director and screenwriter will be adding drama and impact with their creative license. Genres include comedy and musical, action and western, romance, crime, horror and science fiction, among others.

          Documentaries are non-fiction films. Directors and writers help structure the film, rather than creating characters or taking liberties with the facts of the story. Documentaries can take on social, political and economic issues, or profile a person, place or thing.

3. Format

          Feature films take care in introducing complex characters and spinning an intricate storyline over a running time up to three hours. There’s an ebb and flow to the action, with carefully timed and structured mini-climaxes and dramatic highlights. The scripted story, characters and actions all are pointed in the same direction, leading the viewer through events with a sense of beginning, middle, dramatic climax and end.

         
          In documentaries, often the action leads the way. People don’t have scripted words to say or scenes to enact; handheld cameras might be the only way to follow the story. Even the director doesn’t always know what happens next. Documentary makers often say that discovery and surprise is a big part of their job.

4. Production Costs

          Documentaries are usually less expensive to make than feature films, with less elaborate production frills. Documentaries can cost only a few thousand dollars, with small crews, single camera set-ups and few if any paid talent. The result is often raw, unpolished but effective nevertheless.

          Feature films can cost millions, even hundreds of millions of dollars, thanks to top stars with top salaries, directors and scriptwriters, music scores, exotic locations and costumes. A top feature film often has its “money on the screen” with lush cinematography, gorgeous actors and actresses, big bang special effects with large and talented production teams in the background.

Of course, big-name actors sometimes do participate in documentary-making, often with a reduced fee and a strong belief in the project. And some low budget or “indie” feature films turn out to be huge successes.

          In fact, documentaries have become big box office, with serious Academy Award weight sitting with them. Often very entertaining, they can be as controversial nowadays as the subjects they cover.

And some feature films today are taking on very serious topics, with some post-911 war-themed movies seeming more real than the stories they relate.

          

Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose vs Mahatma Gandhi, who do we owe our freedom

         While popular opinion says that the freedom that we enjoy today is the result of the efforts of the Father of the Nation, would it be a delirious thought if Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose had more to do with ousting the British than Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi?

Let’s have a look at what Netaji did for us.

         Even ahead of Gandhiji’s Quit India Movement, Bose had pressed that the Congress serve a six month ultimatum to the British during the Second World War. It was an apt opportunity that Bose thought could be taken advantage of in 1939. But the party spearheaded by Gandhiji refused to act.

Notably, the gearing of the Indian National Army to combat with the British Indian Army coincided with the start of Gandhiji’s Quit India Movement in 1942. The movement fizzled out a few months after it was crushed in three weeks time.

         While the argument still remains whether either were effective in affecting the retreat of the British, what needs primacy here, is Babasaheb Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar’s interview with BBC’s Francis Watson in February 1955.

         Ambedkar pondered as he recalled the then British Prime Minister’s move to retreat from India in 1947 , “I don’t know how Mr Attlee suddenly agreed to give India independence,” and he went on to say, “That is a secret that he will disclose in his autobiography. None expected that he would do that,” he added.

         In the BBC interview he also affirmed that from his “own analysis” he had come to understand that “two things led the Labour party to take this decision” [to free India].

         Ambedkar  explained: “The national army that was raised by Subhas Chandra Bose. The British had been ruling the country in the firm belief that whatever may happen in the country or whatever the politicians do, they will never be able to change the loyalty of soldiers. That was one prop on which they were carrying on the administration. And that was completely dashed to pieces. They found that soldiers could be seduced to form a party — a battalion to blow off the British.”

A year after his interview in October 1956, two months before Ambedkar passed away, the very secret was disclosed by Clement Attlee  in a confidential talk. This talk came out in the open only after two decades.

         What Ambedkar had foreseen only became more consolidated from records and data from credible authorities such as Ajit Doval, National Security Advisor and Major General GD Bakshi.

Excerpts of an observation in a secret report (Nov 1945) by Sir Norman Smith, Director, Intelligence Bureau, only reinforces the impact of the INA on British move to transfer power: “The situation in respect of the Indian National Army is one which warrants disquiet. There has seldom been a matter which has attracted so much Indian public interest and, it is safe to say, sympathy… the threat to the security of the Indian Army is one which it would be unwise to ignore.”

         In 1976, an interesting observation made by Lt General SK Sinha, former Governor of Jammu & Kashmir and Assam, one of the only three Indian officers posted in the Directorate of Military Operations in New Delhi in 1946, is worth a mention: “There was considerable sympathy for the INA within the Army… It is true that fears of another 1857 had begun to haunt the British in 1946.”

To add to it all British MPs met Atlee in 1946 and warned him that, “There are two alternative ways of meeting this common desire (a) that we should arrange to get out, (b) that we should wait to be driven out. In regard to (b), the loyalty of the Indian Army is open to question; the INA have become national heroes…”

         So while it is true that Netaji was sidelined and eventually ousted from the Congress, it cannot be denied that he did erect an army that made the colonialists question their power over India.

Much buzz circulates in the country of his disappearance but little is acknowledged of his crucial role in delivering a powerful blow to the British Raj.

Bose, Not Gandhi, Ended British Rule In India: Ambedkar

           In an interview to BBC in February 1955, Babasaheb elucidated the reason why the British left India in 1947. Subsequently, Attlee agreed Netaji was the toughest challenge the Empire faced. Several defence and intelligence experts agreed, too.

           Why even after 70 years of his disappearance the people of India are so keen on finding out the truth about Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose? A part of the answer has to do with what Netaji did for us.

           Declassified records, testimonies of those who had a ringside view of events coupled with sheer commonsense make it quite evident that Netaji dealt a body blow to the British Raj. As such, for us to brush under the carpet the poignant issue of his fate — how and where he actually died — would constitute a gross affront to his memory and all those associated with him.

           For reasons political, the authorities in India will never acknowledge the paramount role of Netaji in forcing the colonial British to transfer the power in 1947. Perhaps one has heard about it from someone in the family already. In a nutshell, there was not much freedom “fight” going on in India in when the Second World War started in 1939. While Bose saw in it the opportunity of a lifetime and he wanted the Congress to serve a six-month ultimatum on the British to leave India, the party under Mahatma Gandhi’s lead would not do anything to increase pressure on the colonial authorities.

           Ousted from the Congress, Bose left India and became the head of the Indian National Army. Many in India still scoff at the INA, contrasting it with the professional well-trained, much bigger Indian Army, ignoring the odds Bose had overcome to organise it in such a short time.

As the INA geared up to take on the British Indian Army in battlefields, the Mahatma launched the Quit India movement in 1942, which was similar to what Bose had demanded in 1939. The movement was launched in right earnest. But, unfortunately, it was crushed within three weeks and, in a few months, it was all over.

           That Gandhi did wonders for India is true. But to say that the Quit India movement led to Independence would be stretching it too far. So what really clicked? A most logical explanation was given by Babasaheb Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, whose birth anniversary we are observing today.

In a no-holds-barred interview with BBC’s Francis Watson in February 1955, Babasaheb elucidated the reason why the British left India in 1947.

           “I don’t know how Mr Attlee suddenly agreed to give India independence,” wondered Ambedkar, recalling then British Prime Minister’s decision to agree to the transfer of power in 1947. “That is a secret that he will disclose in his autobiography. None expected that he would do that,” he added.

           In October 1956, two months before Ambedkar passed away, Clement Attlee disclosed in a confidential private talk that very secret. It would take two decades before the secret would trickle into the public domain.

           Babasaheb would not have been surprised with Sir Attlee’s admission, for he had foreseen it. He told the BBC in 1955 that from his “own analysis” he had concluded that “two things led the Labour party to take this decision” [to free India].

           Ambedkar continued: “The national army that was raised by Subhas Chandra Bose. The British had been ruling the country in the firm belief that whatever may happen in the country or whatever the politicians do, they will never be able to change the loyalty of soldiers. That was one prop on which they were carrying on the administration. And that was completely dashed to pieces. They found that soldiers could be seduced to form a party — a battalion to blow off the British.”

Today, as we assess the other data on record and factor in the views of experts ranging from National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and Major General GD Bakshi, Babasaheb’s words ring nothing but true.

Sir Norman Smith, Director, Intelligence Bureau, noted in a secret report of November 1945: “The situation in respect of the Indian National Army is one which warrants disquiet. There has seldom been a matter which has attracted so much Indian public interest and, it is safe to say, sympathy… the threat to the security of the Indian Army is one which it would be unwise to ignore.”

Lt General SK Sinha, former Governor of Jammu & Kashmir and Assam, one of the only three Indian officers posted in the Directorate of Military Operations in New Delhi in 1946, made this observation in 1976. “There was considerable sympathy for the INA within the Army… It is true that fears of another 1857 had begun to haunt the British in 1946.”

Agreeing with this contention were a number of British MPs who met British Prime Minister Clement Attlee in February 1946. “There are two alternative ways of meeting this common desire (a) that we should arrange to get out, (b) that we should wait to be driven out. In regard to (b), the loyalty of the Indian Army is open to question; the INA have become national heroes…”

Even in his ‘defeat’, Netaji delivered a massive blow to the British rule in India. And then when India needed him most, he ‘disappeared’.

           Don’t we owe it to Subhas Bose to know what became of him, now that we know so much that the previous generations did not?

Gandhi Not Formally Conferred Father of The Nation Title: Govt

     
         Mahatma Gandhi was never formally conferred the title of Father of the Nation by the government.This was stated by the Home Ministry in reply to an RTI query. ‘Although Mahatma Gandhi is popularly known as Father of the Nation, no such title was ever formally conferred upon him by the government,’Shyamala Mohan, Director and Central Public Information Officer ( CPIO), said in a reply dated June 18 this year.

          The query was filed by social activist Abhishek Kadyan with the Home Ministry on May 21, 2012 seeking information about declaration of  Mahatma Gandhi as Father of the Nation. Abhishek Kadyan is an advisor to Italy based animal rights NGO OIPA.

Earlier, Aishwarya Parashar, a Class- VI student from Lucknow, had filed a similar query through the Right to Information ( RTI) Act seeking a photocopy of the order through which Mahatma Gandhi was declared as Father of the Nation and was informed that there were no specific documents on the information sought. In February, she had sent the RTI application to the central public information officer of Prime Ministers Office. From the PMO, the applicationwas forwarded to Ministry of Home

Affairs. The MHA, however, stating that it does not comes under its purview forwarded the application tothe National Archives of India. The NAI in its reply sent to Aishwarya had said:‘As per the search among the public records in the NAI there is no specific documents on the information being sought by you.’PTI 

Science and Technology in Ancient and Medieval India

            Science and technology in ancient and medieval India covered all the major branches of human knowledge and activities, including mathematics, astronomy, physics, chemistry, medical science and surgery, fine arts, mechanical and production technology, civil engineering and architecture, shipbuilding and navigation, sports and games. Ancient India was a land of sages, saints and seers as well as a land of scholars and scientists.

Ancient India's contribution to science and technology include :-

• Mathematics - Vedic literature is replete with concepts of zero, the techniques of algebra and algorithm, square root and cube root. Arguably, the origins of Calculus lie in India 300 years before Leibnitz and Newton.

• Astronomy - Rig Veda (2000 BC) refers to astronomy.

• Physics - Concepts of atom and theory of relativity were explicitly stated by an Indian Philosopher around 600 BC.

• Chemistry - Principles of chemistry did not remain abstract but also found expression in distillation of perfumes, aromatic liquids, manufacturing of dyes and pigments, and extraction of sugar.

• Medical science & surgery - Around 800 BC, first compendium on medicine and surgery was complied in ancient India.

• Fine Arts - Vedas were recited and recitation has to be correct, which gave rise to a finer study of sound and phonetics. The natural corollary were emergence of music and other forms of performing arts.

• Mechanical & production technology - Greek historians have testified to smelting of certain metals in India in the 4th century BC. Civil engineering & architecture - The discovery of urban settlements of Mohenjodaro and Harappa indicate existence of civil engineering & architecture, which blossomed to a highly precise science of civil engineering and architecture and found expression in innumerable monuments of ancient India.

• Shipbuilding & navigation - Sanskrit and Pali texts have several references to maritime activity by ancient Indians.

• Sports & games - Ancient India is the birth place of chess, ludo, snakes and ladders and playing cards.

1. Mathematics:-

            Mathematics represents a very high level of abstraction attained by human brain. In ancient India, roots to mathematics can be traced to Vedic literature, which are around 4000 years old. Between 1000 BC and 1000 AD, a number of mathematical treatises were authored in India.
Will Durant, American historian (1885-1981) said that India was the mother of our philosophy of much of our mathematics.

            It is now generally accepted that India is the birth place of several mathematical concepts, including zero, the decimal system, algebra and algorithm, square root and cube root. Zero is a numeral as well as a concept. It owes its origin to the Indian philosophy which had a concept of 'sunya', literal translation of which is 'void' and zero emerged as a derivative symbol to represent this philosophical
concept. Geometrical theories were known to ancient Indians and find display in motifs on temple walls, which are in many cases replete with mix of floral and geometric patterns. The method of graduated calculation was documented in a book named "Five Principles" (Panch-
Siddhantika) which dates to 5th Century AD.A. L. Basham, an Australian Indologist, writes in his book, The Wonder That was India that "... the world owes most to India in the realm of mathematics, which was developed in the Gupta period to a stage more advanced than that reached by any other nation ofantiquity.

            The success of Indian mathematics was mainly due to the fact that Indians had a clear conception of the abstract number as distinct from the numerical quantity of objects or spatial extension. Algebraic theories, as also other mathematical concepts, which were in circulation in ancient India, were collected and further developed by Aryabhatta, an Indian mathematician, who lived in the 5th century, in the city of Patna, then called Pataliputra. He has referred to Algebra (as Bijaganitam) in his treatise on mathematics named Aryabhattiya. Another mathematician of the 12th century, Bhaskaracharya also authored several treatises on the subject - one of them, named Siddantha Shiromani has a chapter on algebra. He is known to have given a basic idea of the Rolle's theorum and was the first to conceive of differential calculus. In 1816, James Taylor translated Bhaskaracharya's Leelavati into English. Another translation of the same work by English astronomer Henry Thomas Colebruke appeared next year in 1817. The credit for fine-tuning and internationalizing these mathematical concepts - which had originated in India - goes to the Arabs and Persians. Al- Khawarizmi, a Persian mathematician, developed a technique of calculation that became known as "algorism." This was the seed from which modern arithmetic
algorithms have developed. Al- Khwarizmi's work was translated into Latin under the title Algoritmi de numero Indorum, meaning The System of IndianNumerals.

            A mathematician in Arabic is called Hindsa which means from India. The 14th century Indian mathematician Madhava of Sangamagrama, along with other mathematicians of the Kerala school, studied infinite series, convergence, differentiation, and iterative methods for solution of non-linear
equations. Jyestadeva of the Kerala school wrote the first calculus text, the Yuktibhasa, which explores methods and ideas of calculus repeated only in seventeenth century Europe.

2. Astronomy :-

            Ancient India's contributions in the field
of astronomy are well known and well
documented. The earliest references to
astronomy are found in the Rig Veda,
which are dated 2000 BC. During next
2500 years, by 500 AD, ancient Indian
astronomy has emerged as an important
part of Indian studies and its affect is also seen in several treatises of that period. In some instances, astronomical principles were borrowed to explain matters, pertaining to astrology, like casting of a horoscope. Apart from this linkage of
astronomy with astrology in ancient
India, science of astronomy continued to
develop independently, and culminated
into original findings, like: The calculation of occurrences of eclipses
Determination of Earth's circumference
Theorizing about the theory of gravitation Determining that sun was a star and determination of number of planets under our solar system.
The Pleiades hold a prominent place as
the mothers or wet nurses of the
newborn infant in one of the most
ancient and central Hindu myths, that of
the birth of the war-god Rudra/Skanda,
who evidently represents, among other
things, the victorious rising sun (and as
vernal sun the new year). The Pleiades
are said to have been the wives of the
seven sages, who are identified with the
seven stars of the Great Bear.
The Great Bear's Old Tamil name elu-
meen 'seven-star' corresponds to the
combination of the pictograms '7' + 'fish',
which alone constitutes the entire text of
one finely carved Indus seal. The
Satapatha-Brahmana states that the six
Pleiades were separated from their
husbands on account of their infidelity;
other texts specify that only one of the
seven wives, Arundhati, remained
faithful and was allowed to stay with her
husband: she is the small star Alcor in the Great Bear, pointed out as a paradigm of
marital virtue to the bride in the Vedic
marriage ceremonies.
Evidence for the Harappan origin of this
myth is provided, among other things, by
Indus seals which show a row of six or
seven human figures; their female
character is suggested by the one long
plait of hair, which to the present day has
remained characteristic of the Indian
ladies.

3. Physics :-
            The root to the concept of atom in ancient India is derived from the classification of
material world in five basic elements by
ancient Indian philosophers. These five
'elements' and such a classification
existed since the Vedic times, around
3000 BC before. These five elements were the earth (prithvi), fire (agni), air (vayu), water (jaal) and ether or space (aksha). These elements were also associated with human sensory perceptions: earth with
smell, air with feeling, fire with vision,
water with taste and ether/space with
sound. Later on, Buddhist philosophers
replaced ether/space with life, joy and
sorrow.
From ancient times, Indian philosophers
believed that except ether or space, all
other elements were physically palpable
and hence comprised of small and
minuscule particles of matter. They
believed that the smallest particle which
could not be subdivided further was
paramanu (can be shortened to
parmanu), a Sanskrit word. Paramanu is
made of two Sanskrit words, param
meaning ultimate or beyond and anu
meaning atom. Thus, the term
"paramanu" literally means 'beyond
atom' and this was a concept at an
abstract level which indicated the
possibility of splitting atom, which is now
the source of atomic energy. The term
"atom" however should not be conflated
with the concept of atom as it is
understood today.
Kanada, a 6th century, Indian
philosopher was the first person who
went deep systematically in such
theorization. Another Indian, philosopher
Pakudha Katyayana, who was a
contemporary of Buddha, also
propounded the ideas about the atomic
constitution of the material world. All
these were based on logic and philosophy
and lacked any empirical basis for want
of commensurate technology. Similarly,
the principle of relativity (not to be
confused with Einstein's theory of
relativity) was available in an embryonic
form in the Indian philosophical concept
of 'sapekshavad', the literal translation of
this Sanskrit word is theory of relativity.
These theories have attracted attention of
the Indologists, and veteran Australian
Indologist A. L. Basham has concluded
that they were brilliant imaginative
explanations of the physical structure of
the world, and in a large measure, agreed
with the discoveries of modern physics.

4. Chemistry :-

            Ancient India's development in chemistry
was not confined at an abstract level like
physics, but found development in a
variety of practical activities. In any early
civilization, metallurgy has remained an
activity central to all civilizations from
the Bronze Age and the Iron Age, to all
other civilizations that followed. It is
believed that the basic idea of smelting
reached ancient India from Mesopotamia
and the Near East. Coinage dating from
the 8th Century B.C. to the 17th Century
A.D. Numismatic evidence of the
advances made by smelting technology in
ancient India.
Nataraja the God of Dance is made of five metals Pancha-Dhatu.
In the 5th century BC, the Greek historian Herodotus has observed that Indian and
the Persian army used arrows tipped with
iron. Ancient Romans were using armor
and cutlery made of Indian iron.
In India itself, certain objects testify to
the higher level of metallurgy achieved by the ancient Indians. By the side of Qutub Minar, a World heritage site, in Delhi,
stands an Iron Pillar. The pillar is
believed to be cast in the Gupta period
around circa 500 AD. The pillar is 7.32
meters tall, tapering from a diameter of
40 cm at the base to 30 cm at the top and is estimated to weigh 6 tonnes. It has
been standing in the open for last 1500
years, withstanding the wind, heat and
weather, but still has not rusted, except
very minor natural erosion. This kind of
rust proof iron was not possible till iron
and steel was discovered few decades
before.

            The advance nature of ancient India's
chemical science also finds expression in
other fields, like distillation of perfumes
and fragment ointments, manufacturing
of dyes and chemicals, polishing of
mirrors, preparation of pigments and
colours. Paintings found on walls of
Ajanta and Ellora (both World heritage
sites) which look fresh even after 1000
years, also testify to the high level of
chemical science achieved in ancient
India.

5. Medicine & Surgery :-

            Ayurveda as a science of medicine owes
its origins in ancient India. Ayurveda
consists of two Sanskrit words - 'ayur'
meaning age or life, and 'veda' which
means knowledge. Thus, the literal
meaning of Ayurveda is the science of life
or longevity. Ayurveda constitutes ideas
about ailments and diseases, their
symptoms, diagnosis and cure, and relies
heavily on herbal medicines, including
extracts of several plants of medicinal
values. This reliance on herbs
differentiates Ayurveda from systems like
Allopathy and Homeopathy. Ayurveda has
also always disassociated itself with witch
doctors and voodoo.
Ancient scholars of India like Atreya, and
Agnivesa have dealt with principles of
Ayurveda as long back as 800 BC. Their
works and other developments were
consolidated by Charaka who compiled a
compendium of Ayurvedic principles and
practices in his treatise Charaka-
Samahita, which remained like a
standard textbook almost for 2000 years
and was translated into many languages,
including Arabic and Latin. 'Charaka-
Samahita' deals with a variety of matters
covering physiology, etiology and
embryology, concepts of digestion,
metabolism, and immunity. Preliminary
concepts of genetics also find a mention,
for example, Charaka has theorized
blindness from the birth is not due to any
defect in the mother or the father, but
owes its origin in the ovum and the
sperm.

            In ancient India, several advances were
also made in the field of medical surgery.
Specifically these advances icluded areas
like plastic surgery, extraction of catracts,
and even dental surgery. Roots to the
ancient Indian surgery go back to at least
circa 800 BC. Shushruta, a medical
theoretician and practitioner, lived 2000
years bebore, in the ancient Indian city of
Kasi, now called Varanasi. He wrote a
medical compendium called 'Shushruta-
Samahita. This ancient medical
compendium describes at least seven
branches of surgery: Excision,
Scarification, Puncturing, Exploration,
Extraction, Evacuation, and Suturing. The
compendium also deals with matters like
rhinoplasty (plastic surgery) and
ophthalmology (ejection of cataracts). The
compendium also focuses on the study
the human anatomy by using a dead
body.

            In ancient India Medical Science `supposedly made many advances.
Specifically these advances were in the areas of plastic surgery, extraction of cataracts, and dental surgery. There is documentary evidence to prove the existence of these practices.
An artist's impression of an operation being performed in ancient India. In spite of the absence of anesthesia, complex operations were performed. The practice of surgery has been recorded in India around 800 B.C. This need not come as a surprise because surgery (Shastrakarma) is one ofthe eight branches of Ayurveda the ancient Indian system of medicine. The oldest treatise dealing with surgery is the Shushruta Samahita (Shushruta's compendium). Shusruta who lived in Kasi was one of them any Indian medical practitioners who included Atraya and Charaka. He was one of the first to study the human anatomy. In the Shusruta, Samahita he has described in detail the study of anatomy with the aid of a dead body. Shusruta's forte was rhinoplasty (Plastic surgery)and ophthalmialogy (ejection of cataracts). Shushruta has described surgery under eight heads Chedya (excision), Lekhya
(scarification),Vedhya (puncturing), Esya (exploration), Ahrya (extraction), Vsraya (evacuation) and Sivya (Suturing). Yoga is a system of exercise for physical and mental nourishment. The origins of yoga are shrouded in antiquity and mystery. Since Vedic times, thousand ofyears before, the principles and practice of yoga have crystallized. But, it was only around 200 BC that all the fundamentals of yoga were collected by Patanjali in his treatise, named Yogasutra, that is, Yoga- Aphorisms.

            In short, Patanjali surmised that through the practice of yoga, the energy latent within the human body may be made live and released, which has a salubrious affect on the body and the mind. Now, in modern times, clinical practices have established that several ailments, including hypertension, clinical depression, amnesia, acidity, can be controlled and managed by yogic practices. The application of yoga in physiotherapy is also gaining recognition.

6. Civil Engineering & Architecture :-

            India's urban civilization is traceable to Mohenjodaro and Harappa, now in Pakistan, where planned urban townships existed 5000 years before. From then onwards, the ancient Indian architecture and civil engineering continued to develop and grow. It found manifestation in construction of temples, palaces and forts across the Indian peninsula and the neighbouring regions. In ancient India, architecture and civil engineering was known as sthapatya-kala, literal translation of which means the art of constructing (something).

            During the periods of Kushan Empire and Maurya empires, the Indian architecture and civil engineering reached to regions like Baluchistan and Afghanistan. Statues of Buddha were cut out, covering entire mountain faces and cliffs, like Buddhas of Bamiyan, Afghanistan. Over a period of time, ancient Indian art of construction blended with Greek styles and spread to Central Asia.

            On the other side, Buddhism took Indian style of architecture and civil engineering to countries like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, Burma, China, Korea and Japan. Angkor Wat is a living testimony to the contribution of Indian civil engineering and architecture to the Cambodian Khmer heritage in the field of architecture and civil engineering.

            In mainland India of today, there are several marvels of ancient India's architectural heritage, including World heritage sites like Ajanta, Ellora, Khajuraho, Mahabodhi Temple, Sanchi, Brihadisvara Temple and Mahabalipuram. Production Technology Mechanical and production technology of ancient India ensured processing of natural produce and their conversion into merchandise of trade, commerce and export. A number of travelers and historians (including Megasthanes, Ptolemy, Faxian, Xuanzang, Marco Polo, Al Baruni and Ibn Batuta) have indicated a variety of items, which were produced, consumed and exported around that society's "known world" by the ancient Indians.

7. Shipbuilding & Navigation :-

            A panel found in Mohenjodaro depicts a sailing craft, and thousands of years later Ajanta murals also depict a sea-faring ship. The science of shipbuilding and navigation was well known to ancient Indians. Sanskrit and Pali texts are replete with maritime references, and ancient Indians, particularly from the coastal regions, were having commercial relations with several countries of across the Bay of Bengal like Cambodia, Java, Sumatra, Borneo, and even up to China.

            Similar maritime and trade relations existed with countries across the Arabian Sea like Arabia, Egypt and Persia. Even around circa 500 AD, sextants and mariner's compass were not unknown to ancient Indian shipbuilders and navigators. J.L. Reid, a member of the Institute of Naval Architects and Shipbuilders, England, at around the beginning of the 20th century has got published in the Bombay Gazetteer that "The early Hindu astrologers are said to have used the magnet, in fixing the North and East, in laying foundations, and other religious ceremonies. The Hindu compass was an iron fish that floated in a vessel of oil and pointed to the North. The fact of this older Hindu compass seems placed beyond doubt by the Sanskrit word 'Maccha-Yantra', or 'fish-machine', which Molesworth gives as a name for the mariner's compass".